Reading is a means of communicating a message. The whole point of
it is that understanding occurs. This is why I have to call into question
the judgment of those proposing using made up words to test reading skills of
children. See Koob and Zort the non words in the new reading test for six year olds.
With over 200,000 words in the Oxford English Dictionary, surely it is
unnecessary to make up words in order to check a child’s ability to use phonic
rules. Apart from that, not all English words can be deciphered by use of
phonics. We have what are known as ‘Sight Words’ or phonetically
irregular words, which are those that are pronounced without decoding the
word's spelling, for example “these”, “because” and many other common words.
As a teacher of reading, I constantly use reading tests and from these I
can identify which words a child is reading by using phonic reasoning and
sounding out strategies. I also note where sight words are not known and
base that child’s personalised learning programme on that assessment.
The inclusion of non-words is completely unnecessary and I would argue
potentially damaging. Children rightly expect their teachers to be
leading by example and ought to be able to ask the meaning of any word used and
be given the answer. By making up words we are undermining the whole
learning process.
I’m sure that I’m not the only professional educationalist who is
getting tired of political interference of the micromanaging type. We are
told that we need more tests such as the phonics-based reading check for
six-year-olds. Good teachers know how well their students are doing and
test in order to shape teaching and learning rather than for the sake of
Government statistics and league tables. Yes, of course we want to raise
standards in reading but more testing isn’t how to do it. This is certainly not done by making up
nonsense words which don’t have a meaning to convey therefore do not deserve to
be words.
I teach English and Maths to children
as a tutor and I see the results of teaching every day. Some teachers are
better than others but I am yet to find one who didn’t know more about how to
teach children than the Minister for Education. What children need is education
that meets their specific needs and tailored to their personal strengths and
weaknesses. Clearly this is not something that is helped by this new proposal.
Jan Long
Centre Director
Kip McGrath Education Centre (Southampton)
No comments:
Post a Comment